Set-Off

From Riverview Legal Group
Revision as of 21:14, 11 February 2020 by P08916 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Legal Principles ==[http://canlii.ca/t/hvq73 Daly Square Inc. v. 1786097 Ontario Inc. and Camille Mikhael, 2018 ONSC 6404 (CanLII)]== [28] While legal set off r...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.


Daly Square Inc. v. 1786097 Ontario Inc. and Camille Mikhael, 2018 ONSC 6404 (CanLII)

[28] While legal set off requires mutual debts, equitable set off does not. Equitable set off may apply where a defendant makes a claim against a plaintiff in relation to the same contract or series of events that gave rise to the plaintiff’s claim. Five principles are relevant to the availability of equitable set off: 1) The party claiming set off must show that it has an equitable basis for being protected from the opposite party’s claim; 2) the equitable basis must go to the very root of the plaintiff’s claim; 3) the counterclaim must be so clearly connected with the plaintiff’s demand that it would be manifestly unjust to allow the plaintiff to enforce payment without taking the counterclaim into consideration; 4) the claim and the counterclaim do not have to arise out of the same contract; and 5) unliquidated claims are on the same footing as liquidated claims.

[39] Legal set off applies to mutual debts.[4] “Mutual debts” are debts due from either party to the other for liquidated sums or money demands which can be ascertained with certainty at the time of pleading.[5]