Urgent Motions during COVID-19 (Civil): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
mNo edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
* [https://www.ontariocourts.ca/scj/notices-and-orders-covid-19/consolidated-notice/ Consolidated Notice to the Profession, Litigants, Accused Persons, Public and the Media]
* [https://www.ontariocourts.ca/scj/notices-and-orders-covid-19/consolidated-notice/ Consolidated Notice to the Profession, Litigants, Accused Persons, Public and the Media]
* [[:Category:Court Location Information | Court Location Information]]
* [[:Category:Court Location Information | Court Location Information]]
==Maksoud v Canadian Alliance of Physiotherapy Regulators, 2020 ONSC 3175 (CanLII)==
[1] Mr. Maksoud seeks leave to commence an application on an urgent basis pursuant to the Notice to the Profession dated March 15, 2020 as amended. The applicant seeks Charter remedies concerning the alleged unconstitutionality of the regulation governing licensing of physiotherapists in Ontario.
[2] The court has had to restrict its services due personnel limitations caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Although processes have been instituted to allow many categories of civil proceedings to be heard in Toronto at this time, the proposed application raises substantial constitutional questions. It requires a long hearing at best assuming there are no material facts in dispute. If the factual matrix is not complete or is contested, then a trial is likely required.


==Notes==
==Notes==

Revision as of 20:40, 5 November 2020


Matters accepted as urgent

  • Public health matters directly relating to COVID-19[1]
  • Termination of commercial tenancies or evictions relating to residential tenancies[2]
  • Enforcement of court orders, including repayment of funds[3]
  • Confidentiality orders affecting the privacy interests of children[4]
  • National political processes and participation in elections[5]
  • Issuance or removal of writs allowing a transaction to close[6]
  • Certificates of pending litigation[7]
  • Circumstances where significant financial harm may occur (including employment matters)[8]
  • The protection of public safety, such as an injunction preventing entry by a third-party into a condo unit during the pandemic or risk of harm to third parties

Notices to the Professional

Maksoud v Canadian Alliance of Physiotherapy Regulators, 2020 ONSC 3175 (CanLII)

[1] Mr. Maksoud seeks leave to commence an application on an urgent basis pursuant to the Notice to the Profession dated March 15, 2020 as amended. The applicant seeks Charter remedies concerning the alleged unconstitutionality of the regulation governing licensing of physiotherapists in Ontario.

[2] The court has had to restrict its services due personnel limitations caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Although processes have been instituted to allow many categories of civil proceedings to be heard in Toronto at this time, the proposed application raises substantial constitutional questions. It requires a long hearing at best assuming there are no material facts in dispute. If the factual matrix is not complete or is contested, then a trial is likely required.

Notes

[2] [1] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Retire-At-Home Limited Partnership v. 0900558 B.C. Ltd., 2020 ONSC 3674 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j8835>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  2. 2.0 2.1 Elias Restaurant v. Sheppard-Keele Plaza., 2020 ONSC 3609 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j86h1>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  3. 3.0 3.1 Crawford Packaging Inc. v. Dorata, 2020 ONSC 3555 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j854s>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  4. 4.0 4.1 Attorney General of Ontario v. 947014 Ontario Inc. & Michael Norwood (Estate), 2020 ONSC 3510 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j8291>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  5. 5.0 5.1 Harbouredge Commercial Finance v. Wong, 2020 ONSC 3540 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j84pd>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  6. 6.0 6.1 1910878 Ontario Inc. v. 2551204 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 3415 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j7ztk>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  7. 7.0 7.1 768211 Ontario Inc. v. Mount Elgin Golfers Club Inc. et al, 2020 ONSC 3401 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j7ztl>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  8. 8.0 8.1 Maksoud v Canadian Alliance of Physiotherapy Regulators, 2020 ONSC 3175 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j7v7t>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  9. Slimmon-Weber v. Racco, 2020 ONSC 2169 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j6csn>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  10. Wang v 2426483 Ontario Limited, 2020 ONSC 2040 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j69r8>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  11. Ali v. Tariq, 2020 ONSC 1695 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j5xxd>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  12. Oppong v. Desoro Holdings Inc., 2020 ONSC 1689 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j5xs6>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  13. Hrvoic v. Hrvoic, 2020 ONSC 1711 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j600z>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  14. Gharib v. Mohos, 2020 ONSC 1872 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j61cc>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  15. Morris v. Onca, 2020 ONSC 1805 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j607f>, retrieved on 2020-07-08
  16. Chu Resto YS Inc. v Greentower Service Inc., 2020 ONSC 1721 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/j607b>, retrieved on 2020-07-08