User contributions for MKent
From Riverview Legal Group
25 July 2025
- 19:5119:51, 25 July 2025 diff hist +28 Affidavit - Minors (N12) →Children's Law Reform Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.12 current
- 19:5019:50, 25 July 2025 diff hist +756 Affidavit - Minors (N12) →Nagra v Brar, 2022 CanLII 127239 (ON LTB)
- 18:1818:18, 25 July 2025 diff hist −1 Illegal Rent Charges →Price v. Turnbull's Grove Inc., 2007 ONCA 408 (CanLII) current
24 July 2025
- 21:3321:33, 24 July 2025 diff hist −113 Administrative Monetary Penalties - AMPS (Constitutional Validity) →Canada (Competition Bureau) v. Yellow Pages Marketing B.V., 2013 ONCA 71 (CanLII) current
- 21:2921:29, 24 July 2025 diff hist +283 Administrative Monetary Penalties - AMPS (Constitutional Validity) No edit summary
- 21:2521:25, 24 July 2025 diff hist +31 Administrative Monetary Penalties - AMPS (Constitutional Validity) →Rowan v. Ontario Securities Commission, 2012 ONCA 208 (CanLII)
- 21:2121:21, 24 July 2025 diff hist +1 Administrative Monetary Penalties - AMPS (Constitutional Validity) No edit summary
- 21:2021:20, 24 July 2025 diff hist +2,542 N Administrative Monetary Penalties - AMPS (Constitutional Validity) Created page with "==<i>Rowan v. Ontario Securities Commission,</i> 2012 ONCA 208 (CanLII)<ref name="Rowan"/> [4] The appellants challenge the constitutionality of s. 127(1)(9) of the Act, the provision that allows the Commission to impose administrative monetary penalties ("AMPs"). The appellants argue that because the maximum penalty of $1 million can be imposed for each transaction in a single course of infractions, the potential size of an AMP is so large that it amounts to a penal s..."
27 June 2025
- 03:2903:29, 27 June 2025 diff hist +13 Employee-Employer Relationship →O'Reilly v. ClearMRI Solutions Ltd., 2021 ONCA 385 (CanLII) current
- 03:2603:26, 27 June 2025 diff hist +3,475 Employee-Employer Relationship →References
- 03:1503:15, 27 June 2025 diff hist +81 Employee-Employer Relationship No edit summary
- 03:1303:13, 27 June 2025 diff hist −1 Employee-Employer Relationship →Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd., 1997 CanLII 332 (SCC), [1997] 3 SCR 701
- 03:1103:11, 27 June 2025 diff hist +3,164 N Employee-Employer Relationship Created page with "Category:Employment Law ==<i>Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd.,</i> 1997 CanLII 332 (SCC), [1997] 3 SCR 701<ref name="Wallace"/>== 91 The contract of employment has many characteristics that set it apart from the ordinary commercial contract. Some of the views on this subject that have already been approved of in previous decisions of this Court (see e.g. <i>Machtinger, supra</i>) bear repeating. As K. Swinton noted in “Contract..."
19 June 2025
- 23:3723:37, 19 June 2025 diff hist −2 Return of Personal Property (Motion - s. 104) →Baca v Tatarinov, 2017 ONSC 2935 (CanLII) current
- 23:3723:37, 19 June 2025 diff hist +3 Return of Personal Property (Motion - s. 104) →Baca v Tatarinov, 2017 ONSC 2935 (CanLII)
- 19:4519:45, 19 June 2025 diff hist +84 Interlocutory Injunction Or Mandatory Order No edit summary current
- 19:4419:44, 19 June 2025 diff hist +611 Interlocutory Injunction Or Mandatory Order →R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194: RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
- 19:4219:42, 19 June 2025 diff hist +7 Interlocutory Injunction Or Mandatory Order →Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43
- 19:4219:42, 19 June 2025 diff hist +293 Interlocutory Injunction Or Mandatory Order →R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194: RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
- 19:3719:37, 19 June 2025 diff hist +1,750 Interlocutory Injunction Or Mandatory Order No edit summary
- 19:2719:27, 19 June 2025 diff hist +85 Return of Personal Property (Motion - s. 104) No edit summary
- 19:2219:22, 19 June 2025 diff hist +2 Return of Personal Property (Motion - s. 104) →Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43
- 19:2219:22, 19 June 2025 diff hist +885 Return of Personal Property (Motion - s. 104) →Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43
- 19:1919:19, 19 June 2025 diff hist +1,671 Return of Personal Property (Motion - s. 104) →References
- 19:1419:14, 19 June 2025 diff hist −1 Return of Personal Property (Motion - s. 104) →Baca v Tatarinov, 2017 ONSC 2935 (CanLII)
- 19:1319:13, 19 June 2025 diff hist +5,603 Return of Personal Property (Motion - s. 104) →References
- 19:0319:03, 19 June 2025 diff hist +1,957 N Return of Personal Property (Motion - s. 104) Created page with "Category:Civil Proceedings ==<i>Courts of Justice Act</i>, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43<ref name="CJA"/>== <b>Interim order for recovery of personal property</b> 104 (1) In an action in which the recovery of possession of personal property is claimed and it is alleged that the property, :(a) was unlawfully taken from the possession of the plaintiff; or :(b) is unlawfully detained by the defendant, the court, on motion, may make an interim order for recovery of possessi..."
6 June 2025
- 15:3915:39, 6 June 2025 diff hist +79 Isolated Comments No edit summary current
- 15:3815:38, 6 June 2025 diff hist +1 Isolated Comments →Banwait v. Forsyth (No. 2), 2008 BCHRT 81 (CanLII)
- 15:3815:38, 6 June 2025 diff hist −2 Isolated Comments →Banwait v. Forsyth (No. 2), 2008 BCHRT 81 (CanLII)
- 15:3715:37, 6 June 2025 diff hist +2,223 Isolated Comments →References
- 15:3015:30, 6 June 2025 diff hist +577 Isolated Comments →Pardo v. School District No. 43, 2003 BCHRT 71 (CanLII)
- 15:2715:27, 6 June 2025 diff hist +5 Isolated Comments →Pardo v. School District No. 43, 2003 BCHRT 71 (CanLII)
- 15:2615:26, 6 June 2025 diff hist +1,289 Isolated Comments →References
- 15:2415:24, 6 June 2025 diff hist +1 Isolated Comments →Latronico v. York Region District School Board, 2011 HRTO 2012 (CanLII)
- 15:2315:23, 6 June 2025 diff hist +2,117 Isolated Comments →References
5 June 2025
- 17:3317:33, 5 June 2025 diff hist +14 Isolated Comments →Trang v. Alberta (Edmonton Remand Centre), 2010 ABQB 6 (CanLII)
- 17:3317:33, 5 June 2025 diff hist +14 Isolated Comments →Trang v. Alberta (Edmonton Remand Centre), 2010 ABQB 6 (CanLII)
- 17:3117:31, 5 June 2025 diff hist +14 Isolated Comments →Trang v. Alberta (Edmonton Remand Centre), 2010 ABQB 6 (CanLII)
- 17:3017:30, 5 June 2025 diff hist +1 Isolated Comments →Trang v. Alberta (Edmonton Remand Centre), 2010 ABQB 6 (CanLII)
- 17:2917:29, 5 June 2025 diff hist +500 Isolated Comments →Trang v. Alberta (Edmonton Remand Centre), 2010 ABQB 6 (CanLII)
- 17:1817:18, 5 June 2025 diff hist +2,653 N Isolated Comments Created page with "Category:Human Rights ==<i>Trang v. Alberta (Edmonton Remand Centre),</i> 2010 ABQB 6 (CanLII)<ref name="Trang"/>== [1125] In <b><i>Dhanjal v. Air Canada,</b></i> [1996] C.H.R.D. No. 4 the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal concluded that the “conduct must include a racial dimension and have the effect of humiliating or offending the person who is the victim” (at para. 209). [1126] The Tribunal, as noted above, held that the context was very important (para. 21..."
2 May 2025
- 18:4918:49, 2 May 2025 diff hist +4 Indigenous Property →Indian Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. I-5) current
- 18:4818:48, 2 May 2025 diff hist −12 Indigenous Property →Indian Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. I-5)
- 18:4818:48, 2 May 2025 diff hist +928 Indigenous Property →Indian Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. I-5)
- 18:4418:44, 2 May 2025 diff hist +102 Interpretations - Rights of Indigenous Peoples No edit summary current
- 18:4218:42, 2 May 2025 diff hist +60 N Interpretations- Rights of Indigenous Peoples MKent moved page Interpretations- Rights of Indigenous Peoples to Interpretations - Rights of Indigenous Peoples current Tag: New redirect
- 18:4218:42, 2 May 2025 diff hist 0 m Interpretations - Rights of Indigenous Peoples MKent moved page Interpretations- Rights of Indigenous Peoples to Interpretations - Rights of Indigenous Peoples
- 18:4218:42, 2 May 2025 diff hist +3,641 N Interpretations - Rights of Indigenous Peoples Created page with "==<i>Restoule v. Canada,</i> 2020 ONSC 393<ref name="Restoule"/>== [207] Over the last few decades, <b><u>the courts have developed well established principles to guide interpretation of legislation relating to Indigenous peoples, including legislation that affects Indigenous rights.</b></u>[138] The Supreme Court of Canada has held that <b><u>legislation relating to Indigenous peoples should receive a large, liberal, and purposive interpretation, and that linguis..."
