User contributions for MKent
From Riverview Legal Group
2 May 2025
- 18:4918:49, 2 May 2025 diff hist +4 Indigenous Property →Indian Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. I-5) current
- 18:4818:48, 2 May 2025 diff hist −12 Indigenous Property →Indian Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. I-5)
- 18:4818:48, 2 May 2025 diff hist +928 Indigenous Property →Indian Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. I-5)
- 18:4418:44, 2 May 2025 diff hist +102 Interpretations - Rights of Indigenous Peoples No edit summary current
- 18:4218:42, 2 May 2025 diff hist +60 N Interpretations- Rights of Indigenous Peoples MKent moved page Interpretations- Rights of Indigenous Peoples to Interpretations - Rights of Indigenous Peoples current Tag: New redirect
- 18:4218:42, 2 May 2025 diff hist 0 m Interpretations - Rights of Indigenous Peoples MKent moved page Interpretations- Rights of Indigenous Peoples to Interpretations - Rights of Indigenous Peoples
- 18:4218:42, 2 May 2025 diff hist +3,641 N Interpretations - Rights of Indigenous Peoples Created page with "==<i>Restoule v. Canada,</i> 2020 ONSC 393<ref name="Restoule"/>== [207] Over the last few decades, <b><u>the courts have developed well established principles to guide interpretation of legislation relating to Indigenous peoples, including legislation that affects Indigenous rights.</b></u>[138] The Supreme Court of Canada has held that <b><u>legislation relating to Indigenous peoples should receive a large, liberal, and purposive interpretation, and that linguis..."
1 May 2025
- 17:5917:59, 1 May 2025 diff hist +1 Indigenous Property →Mitchell v. Peguis Indian Band, 1990 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 85
- 17:5817:58, 1 May 2025 diff hist +79 Indigenous Property →Mitchell v. Peguis Indian Band, 1990 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 85
- 17:5017:50, 1 May 2025 diff hist +1,223 Indigenous Property →Mitchell v. Peguis Indian Band, 1990 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 85
- 17:3617:36, 1 May 2025 diff hist +31 Indigenous Property →Mitchell v. Peguis Indian Band, 1990 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 85
- 16:5216:52, 1 May 2025 diff hist +137 Indigenous Property →Mitchell v. Peguis Indian Band, 1990 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 85
- 16:5116:51, 1 May 2025 diff hist −21 Indigenous Property →Mitchell v. Peguis Indian Band, 1990 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 85
- 16:5016:50, 1 May 2025 diff hist +9,135 Indigenous Property →Mitchell v. Peguis Indian Band, 1990 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1990] 2 SCR 85
- 16:3716:37, 1 May 2025 diff hist +1,137 Indigenous Property →References
- 16:3116:31, 1 May 2025 diff hist +54 Indigenous Property No edit summary
- 16:3016:30, 1 May 2025 diff hist +64 Indigenous Property →Indian Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. I-5)
- 16:3016:30, 1 May 2025 diff hist +2 Indigenous Property No edit summary
- 16:3016:30, 1 May 2025 diff hist +1,260 N Indigenous Property Created page with "==<i>Indian Act</i> (R.S.C., 1985, c. I-5)<ref name="Indian"/> 90 (1) For the purposes of sections 87 and 89, personal property that was :(a) purchased by Her Majesty with Indian moneys or moneys appropriated by Parliament for the use and benefit of Indians or bands, or :(b) given to Indians or to a band under a treaty or agreement between a band and Her Majesty, shall be deemed always to be situated on a reserve. <b>Restriction on transfer</b> (2) Every transactio..."
- 16:2116:21, 1 May 2025 diff hist +3 Settlement (Garnishment) →O. Reg. 258/98: RULES OF THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT current
- 16:2016:20, 1 May 2025 diff hist +6 Settlement (Garnishment) →R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194: RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
- 16:1916:19, 1 May 2025 diff hist +802 Settlement (Garnishment) →References
- 16:1616:16, 1 May 2025 diff hist +1,342 Settlement (Garnishment) →References
- 16:0416:04, 1 May 2025 diff hist +101 Settlement (Garnishment) No edit summary
- 16:0216:02, 1 May 2025 diff hist +67 Settlement (Garnishment) No edit summary
- 16:0016:00, 1 May 2025 diff hist +52 Settlement (Garnishment) →Raso v. Bayne, 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)
- 15:5815:58, 1 May 2025 diff hist +35 Settlement (Garnishment) →Wages Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. W.1
- 15:5615:56, 1 May 2025 diff hist +116 Settlement (Garnishment) →House v. Baird, 2019 ONSC 1712 (CanLII)
- 15:5315:53, 1 May 2025 diff hist +2 Settlement (Garnishment) →House v. Baird, 2019 ONSC 1712 (CanLII)
- 15:5215:52, 1 May 2025 diff hist +3,232 Settlement (Garnishment) →References
- 15:4515:45, 1 May 2025 diff hist +1 Settlement (Garnishment) →Raso v. Bayne, 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)
- 15:4415:44, 1 May 2025 diff hist +7 Settlement (Garnishment) →House v. Baird, 2019 ONSC 1712 (CanLII)
- 15:4315:43, 1 May 2025 diff hist +350 Settlement (Garnishment) →House v. Baird, 2019 ONSC 1712 (CanLII)
- 15:4015:40, 1 May 2025 diff hist +16 Settlement (Garnishment) →House v. Baird, 2019 ONSC 1712 (CanLII)
- 15:4015:40, 1 May 2025 diff hist +266 Settlement (Garnishment) →House v. Baird, 2019 ONSC 1712 (CanLII)
- 15:2815:28, 1 May 2025 diff hist +2,160 Settlement (Garnishment) →Raso v. Bayne, 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)
- 15:2315:23, 1 May 2025 diff hist +1 Settlement (Garnishment) →House v. Baird, 2019 ONSC 1712 (CanLII)
- 15:2215:22, 1 May 2025 diff hist +219 Settlement (Garnishment) →Raso v. Bayne, 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)
- 15:2015:20, 1 May 2025 diff hist +2 Settlement (Garnishment) →Raso v. Bayne, 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)
- 15:1915:19, 1 May 2025 diff hist +1 Settlement (Garnishment) →Raso v. Bayne, 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)
- 15:1915:19, 1 May 2025 diff hist +298 Settlement (Garnishment) →Raso v. Bayne, 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)
- 14:5714:57, 1 May 2025 diff hist +1,817 Settlement (Garnishment) →Raso v. Bayne, 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)
- 14:5414:54, 1 May 2025 diff hist +669 Settlement (Garnishment) →Raso v. Bayne, 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)
- 14:5214:52, 1 May 2025 diff hist +380 Settlement (Garnishment) →Raso v. Bayne, 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)
- 14:5114:51, 1 May 2025 diff hist +924 Settlement (Garnishment) →Raso v. Bayne, 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)
- 14:4814:48, 1 May 2025 diff hist +1,103 N Settlement (Garnishment) Created page with "==<i> Raso v. Bayne,</i> 2020 ONSC 6654 (CanLII)== [11] Frank bears the onus of demonstrating that the settlement ought to be exempt from garnishment (House v. Baird, 2019 ONSC 1712 (Ont. S.C.J.), para. 62). [12] In 20 Toronto Street Holdings Ltd. v. Coffee, Tea or Me Bakeries Inc. (2001), 2001 CanLII 28048 (ON SC), 53 O.R. (3d) 360 (Ont. S.C.J.) Justice Nordheimer states at para. 5: :I start from the basic proposition that garnishment is an equit..."
12 April 2025
- 21:1721:17, 12 April 2025 diff hist +30 N Category:Professionalism Created page with "Category:Caselaw Summaries" current
- 21:1021:10, 12 April 2025 diff hist +161 Integrity (LSO) →Law Society of Upper Canada v. Sharon Ellen Shore, 2006 ONLSHP 55 (CanLII) current
- 21:0921:09, 12 April 2025 diff hist +835 Integrity (LSO) →References
- 21:0721:07, 12 April 2025 diff hist +1,840 Integrity (LSO) →References
