Vehicle Sale (Lemon): Revision history

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

24 July 2024

  • curprev 18:3518:35, 24 July 2024‎ MKent talk contribs‎ 7,817 bytes +156‎ No edit summary
  • curprev 18:3318:33, 24 July 2024‎ MKent talk contribs‎ 7,661 bytes +6,005‎ No edit summary
  • curprev 16:5316:53, 24 July 2024‎ MKent talk contribs‎ 1,656 bytes +1‎ No edit summary
  • curprev 16:5216:52, 24 July 2024‎ MKent talk contribs‎ 1,655 bytes +1,655‎ Created page with "==<i>Louison Automotive Inc. v. Richards,</i> 2023 ONSC 1331 (CanLII)<ref name="Luison"/>== [14] Louison offered no evidence to support his representation that the car was in a good state of repair other than to note that the car, despite its designation as a “lemon” several years earlier, had subsequently been sold to others and driven over 150,000 kms. He gave no evidence about why the car had been declared a “lemon” in 2013 or what repairs had been..."
Retrieved from "https://riverview.legal/encyclopedia/index.php/Vehicle_Sale_(Lemon)"