Section 202: Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Catergory:Category:Landlord & Tenant (Residential) ==<i>Sterling Studio Lofts Incorporated v. Clayton Stel,</i> 2019 ONSC 91 (CanLII)<ref name="Sterling"/>== [35] <b><u>In accordance with s. 202, the terms of the agreement signed by the parties are not determinative</b></u> with respect to the application of the RTA and, in our view, the LTB was entitled to find upon consideration of all the evidence that the true nature of the agreement was for use as a...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[ | [[Category:Landlord & Tenant (Residential)]] | ||
{{Citation: | |||
| categories = Landlord & Tenant (Residential) | |||
| shortlink = | |||
}} | |||
==<i>Sterling Studio Lofts Incorporated v. Clayton Stel,</i> 2019 ONSC 91 (CanLII)<ref name="Sterling"/>== | ==<i>Sterling Studio Lofts Incorporated v. Clayton Stel,</i> 2019 ONSC 91 (CanLII)<ref name="Sterling"/>== | ||
Revision as of 02:30, 31 May 2024
| Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2024-06-29 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 2382 |
| Page Categories: | Landlord & Tenant (Residential) |
| Citation: | Section 202, CLNP 2382, <>, retrieved on 2024-06-29 |
| Editor: | MKent |
| Last Updated: | 2024/05/31 |
Sterling Studio Lofts Incorporated v. Clayton Stel, 2019 ONSC 91 (CanLII)[1]
[35] In accordance with s. 202, the terms of the agreement signed by the parties are not determinative with respect to the application of the RTA and, in our view, the LTB was entitled to find upon consideration of all the evidence that the true nature of the agreement was for use as a rented residential premise. To hold otherwise would result in a triumph of form over substance.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Sterling Studio Lofts Incorporated v. Clayton Stel, 2019 ONSC 91 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/hwwg4>, retrieved on 2024-05-30
