Costs (Merging File): Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
No edit summary |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Hearing Process (LTB)]] | [[Category:Hearing Process (LTB)]] | ||
[[Category:Landlord & Tenant (Residential)]] | |||
{{Citation: | |||
| categories = Hearing Process (LTB) | |||
| shortlink = https://rvt.link/5g | |||
}} | |||
==TSL-04926-19 (Re), 2019 CanLII 87561 (ON LTB)<ref name="TSL-049626"/>== | ==TSL-04926-19 (Re), 2019 CanLII 87561 (ON LTB)<ref name="TSL-049626"/>== |
Latest revision as of 01:38, 26 May 2023
Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
---|---|
Date Retrieved: | 2024-10-31 |
CLNP Page ID: | 2191 |
Page Categories: | Hearing Process (LTB) |
Citation: | Costs (Merging File), CLNP 2191, <https://rvt.link/5g>, retrieved on 2024-10-31 |
Editor: | MKent |
Last Updated: | 2023/05/26 |
Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076
TSL-04926-19 (Re), 2019 CanLII 87561 (ON LTB)[1]
13. The Tenants’ counsel requested costs in the amount of $200.00 per client because the Landlord refused his request to combine all 14 applications into one application. He explained that as a consequence it increased the time taken to prepare for the case.
14. The Board will entertain a request for costs where a party’s conduct unreasonably prolongs the proceeding. Refusing to combine the applications in this case, where the facts giving rise to the application are the same, would unnecessarily prolong the proceedings even if there were strategic considerations for doing so.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 TSL-04926-19 (Re), 2019 CanLII 87561 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/j2hm7>, retrieved on 2023-04-27