Redacted Documents in Evidence (LTB): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Hearing Process (LTB) {{Citation: | categories = [Hearing Process (LTB)] | shortlink = }} ==TSL-95923-18-SA (Re), 2018 CanLII 141586 (ON LTB)<ref name="TSL-95...")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Citation:  
{{Citation:  
| categories = [Hearing Process (LTB)]
| categories = [Hearing Process (LTB)]
| shortlink =  
| shortlink = 4K
}}
}}



Revision as of 18:45, 19 October 2021


Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved: 2024-10-07
CLNP Page ID: 1782
Page Categories: [Hearing Process (LTB)]
Citation: Redacted Documents in Evidence (LTB), CLNP 1782, <4K>, retrieved on 2024-10-07
Editor: Sharvey
Last Updated: 2021/10/19

Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076


TSL-95923-18-SA (Re), 2018 CanLII 141586 (ON LTB)[1]

12. The Landlord did not summons the person who made the complaint to testify as a witness and did not submit a sworn statement, declaration, or affidavit from that person. The Landlord submitted the email and letter from the person who allegedly made the complaint. However, I note that these are heavily redacted to conceal the identity of the person and the signature on the letter is blacked out. As such, I can give little weight to these documents.


[1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 TSL-95923-18-SA (Re), 2018 CanLII 141586 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/j0fjd>, retrieved on 2021-10-19