Duty to Accommodate (LTB): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Citation: | {{Citation: | ||
| categories = Human Rights (LTB), Human Rights | | categories = Human Rights (LTB), Human Rights | ||
| shortlink = | | shortlink = https://rvt.link/dm | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:46, 22 October 2024
| Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2024-11-23 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 1914 |
| Page Categories: | Human Rights (LTB), Human Rights |
| Citation: | Duty to Accommodate (LTB), CLNP 1914, <https://rvt.link/dm>, retrieved on 2024-11-23 |
| Editor: | Sharvey |
| Last Updated: | 2024/10/22 |
Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076
Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today
TSL-74673-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 71617 (ON LTB)[1]
16. In Walmer Developments v. Ava Wolch, (2003) 2003 CanLII 42163 (ON SCDC), 67 O.R. (3d) 246, a case involving schizophrenia, the Divisional Court concluded that landlords are required to accommodate the needs of disabled tenants to the point of undue hardship.[2] Accordingly, the Board, when exercising discretion under section 83 of the Act, must have regard to a landlord’s obligations under section 17 of the Ontario Human Rights Code.
17. In Walmer v. Wolch the tenant’s behaviour was acceptable so long as she was on her medication. In addition, the tenant requested reasonable accommodation from the Landlord, specifically, that the Landlord immediately inform the tenant’s relatives if the tenant’s conduct became disturbing. The court also stated that if the tenant’s behaviour did not improve promptly, the Landlord could proceed under what was then the Tenant Protection Act.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 TSL-74673-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 71617 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/gv8dx>, retrieved on 2022-05-05
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Walmer Developments v. Wolch, 2003 CanLII 42163 (ON SCDC), <https://canlii.ca/t/5z8k>, retrieved on 2022-05-05
