Personal Representatives (RTA): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
Line 61: Line 61:
<ref name="Bank"><i>Bank Act</i>, (S.C. 1991, c. 46), <https://www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-1.01/index.html>, retrieved on 2023-11-08</ref>
<ref name="Bank"><i>Bank Act</i>, (S.C. 1991, c. 46), <https://www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-1.01/index.html>, retrieved on 2023-11-08</ref>


==<i>Estate of K.D.F. v.TD General Insurance Company,</i> 2022 CanLII 20127 (ON LAT)<ref name="KDF"/>
==<i>Estate of K.D.F. v.TD General Insurance Company,</i> 2022 CanLII 20127 (ON LAT)<ref name="KDF"/>==


[34]        <i>Riggs Estate v. Intact</i> is directly on point. In that case, the insured died prior to executing the settlement documents. As is the case here, the insurer argued that the Regulations provided that the insured person must execute the SDN personally. The Superior Court disagreed, stating that at most while there is a presumption that the insured person will sign the document, it is not uncommon for a recipient of accident benefits to be under the age of majority or be suffering from a physical or mental disability that legally prevents them from signing the document without the assistance of a representative. <b><u>The Court opined that there is no distinction between an insured under disability who cannot sign an SDN and a deceased insured, ultimately finding that an authorized personal representative must be allowed to sign for the insured person.</b></u> Justice Reid held that the Court would have found the settlement between the parties binding and enforceable if such a dispute was not subject to this Tribunal’s jurisdiction.[2] While I agree with TD Insurance these comments are obiter dicta, I see no basis to depart from the reasoning.  
[34]        <i>Riggs Estate v. Intact</i> is directly on point. In that case, the insured died prior to executing the settlement documents. As is the case here, the insurer argued that the Regulations provided that the insured person must execute the SDN personally. The Superior Court disagreed, stating that at most while there is a presumption that the insured person will sign the document, it is not uncommon for a recipient of accident benefits to be under the age of majority or be suffering from a physical or mental disability that legally prevents them from signing the document without the assistance of a representative. <b><u>The Court opined that there is no distinction between an insured under disability who cannot sign an SDN and a deceased insured, ultimately finding that an authorized personal representative must be allowed to sign for the insured person.</b></u> Justice Reid held that the Court would have found the settlement between the parties binding and enforceable if such a dispute was not subject to this Tribunal’s jurisdiction.[2] While I agree with TD Insurance these comments are obiter dicta, I see no basis to depart from the reasoning.  

Revision as of 21:51, 8 November 2023


Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved: 2024-11-23
CLNP Page ID: 2017
Page Categories: [Contract Law, Leases, & Sub-Letting (LTB)], [Section 2 (RTA)]
Citation: Personal Representatives (RTA), CLNP 2017, <https://rvt.link/1d>, retrieved on 2024-11-23
Editor: MKent
Last Updated: 2023/11/08

Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076

Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today


Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17[1]

2 (1) In this Act,

...
“landlord” includes,
(a) the owner of a rental unit or any other person who permits occupancy of a rental unit, other than a tenant who occupies a rental unit in a residential complex and who permits another person to also occupy the unit or any part of the unit,
(b) the heirs, assigns, personal representatives and successors in title of a person referred to in clause (a), and
(c) a person, other than a tenant occupying a rental unit in a residential complex, who is entitled to possession of the residential complex and who attempts to enforce any of the rights of a landlord under a tenancy agreement or this Act, including the right to collect rent; (“locateur”)
...
“tenant” includes a person who pays rent in return for the right to occupy a rental unit and includes the tenant’s heirs, assigns and personal representatives, but “tenant” does not include a person who has the right to occupy a rental unit by virtue of being,
(a) a co-owner of the residential complex in which the rental unit is located, or
(b) a shareholder of a corporation that owns the residential complex; (“locataire”)

[1]

Estates Administration Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.22[2]

1 In this Act,

“court” means the Superior Court of Justice; (“cour”)
“judge” means a judge of the Superior Court of Justice; (“juge”)
“mentally incapable person” means a person who is incapable as defined in the Substitute Decisions Act, 1992, whether or not the person has a guardian or an attorney for property under a continuing power of attorney for property; (“incapable mental”)
“personal representative” means an executor, an administrator, or an administrator with the will annexed. (“représentant successoral”) R.S.O. 1990, c. E.22, s. 1; 2006, c. 19, Sched. C, s. 1 (1); 2009, c. 33, Sched. 2, ss. 31 (1, 2).


[2]

Sarmento v. IA Financial Group, 2022 HRTO 1233 (CanLII)[3]

[6] A “personal representative” is defined in s.1 of the Estates Administration Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.22, as “an executor, an administrator, or an administrator with the will annexed.” Pursuant to s. 2 of that legislation, on a person’s death, all real and personal property that does not pass by right of survivorship devolves to and becomes vested in his or her personal representative. Section 7(1) of the Estates Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, provides that an application for a grant of probate or letter of administration must be “made to the Superior Court of Justice” and then filed with the county or district where the decedent resided.

[7] This Tribunal has determined, where the applicant is deceased, it has no authority to proceed without the appointment of an estate trustee. In Denham v. Hamilton Health Sciences Volunteer Association (“Denham”), 2012 HRTO 858, at paragraph 13[4] the Tribunal found that its “…general procedural powers cannot override clear and comprehensive statutory provisions that provide for the appointment by a court of a person or persons to control estate’s assets and make decisions on its behalf”. See also, Donaldson v. Waters Edge Care Community, 2017 HRTO 137[5] and Pankoff v. St. Thomas (City), 2019 HRTO 993.[6]

[8] Though I appreciate the applicant’s submissions, the Application cannot proceed absent a Certificate of Appointment of Estate Trustee, even if the applicant is an executor. See Dorrington v. London Health Sciences Centre, 2018 HRTO 1483.[7]


[3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

Canada Business Corporations Act, (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-44)[8]

personal representative means a person who stands in place of and represents another person including, but not limited to, a trustee, an executor, an administrator, a liquidator of a succession, an administrator of the property of others, a guardian or tutor, a curator, a receiver or sequestrator, an agent or mandatary or an attorney; 

[8]

Bank Act, (S.C. 1991, c. 46)[9]

personal representative means a person who stands in place of and represents another person and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes, as the circumstances require, a trustee, an executor, an administrator, a committee, a guardian, a tutor, a curator, an assignee, a receiver, an agent or an attorney of any person, but does not include a delegate; (représentant personnel)

[9]

Estate of K.D.F. v.TD General Insurance Company, 2022 CanLII 20127 (ON LAT)[10]

[34] Riggs Estate v. Intact is directly on point. In that case, the insured died prior to executing the settlement documents. As is the case here, the insurer argued that the Regulations provided that the insured person must execute the SDN personally. The Superior Court disagreed, stating that at most while there is a presumption that the insured person will sign the document, it is not uncommon for a recipient of accident benefits to be under the age of majority or be suffering from a physical or mental disability that legally prevents them from signing the document without the assistance of a representative. The Court opined that there is no distinction between an insured under disability who cannot sign an SDN and a deceased insured, ultimately finding that an authorized personal representative must be allowed to sign for the insured person. Justice Reid held that the Court would have found the settlement between the parties binding and enforceable if such a dispute was not subject to this Tribunal’s jurisdiction.[2] While I agree with TD Insurance these comments are obiter dicta, I see no basis to depart from the reasoning.

(...)

[36] In my view, as the applicant’s sister was appointed by the court and has already been permitted to sign off on the other settlements that occurred at the same global mediation, she is clearly an authorized personal representative who is able to sign the SDN and release here. With the applicant’s sister installed as the Litigation Administrator for the Estate, there is accordingly no distinction between the applicant’s death preventing her from signing the SDN and, for example, a minor who is legally incapable of signing an SDN or an adult who lacks capacity as a result of a catastrophic brain injury to understand and direct counsel to sign an SDN, both of which occur regularly in accident benefit settlements. To borrow from the Court of Appeal’s analysis in The Estate of Rebecca Wu, I “disagree that the settlement died” with the applicant where, prior to her death, her claim for accident benefits had, by virtue of the settlement, become a contractual right to the agreed amount and which devolved to her Estate upon her death.[3]

[10]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17, <https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/06r17#BK2>, retrieved 2022-10-24
  2. 2.0 2.1 Estates Administration Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.22, <https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90e22>, retrieved 2022-10-24
  3. 3.0 3.1 Sarmento v. IA Financial Group, 2022 HRTO 1233 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jsgp9>, retrieved on 2022-10-24
  4. 4.0 4.1 Denham v. Hamilton Health Sciences Volunteer Association, 2012 HRTO 858 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/fr4tr>, retrieved on 2022-10-24
  5. 5.0 5.1 Donaldson v. Waters Edge Care Community, 2017 HRTO 137 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/gx9fv>, retrieved on 2022-10-24
  6. 6.0 6.1 Pankoff v. St. Thomas (City), 2019 HRTO 993 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/j15pb>, retrieved on 2022-10-24
  7. 7.0 7.1 Dorrington v. London Health Sciences Centre, 2018 HRTO 1483 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/hvr9n>, retrieved on 2022-10-24
  8. 8.0 8.1 Canada Business Corporations Act,(R.S.C., 1985, c. C-44), <https://www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-44/>, retrieved on 2023-11-08
  9. 9.0 9.1 Bank Act, (S.C. 1991, c. 46), <https://www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-1.01/index.html>, retrieved on 2023-11-08
  10. 10.0 10.1 Estate of K.D.F. v.TD General Insurance Company, 2022 CanLII 20127 (ON LAT), <https://canlii.ca/t/jn70b>, retrieved on 2023-11-08