Intentional Interference with Economic Relations: Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Citation:  
{{Citation:  
| categories = Tort Law
| categories = Tort Law
| shortlink =  
| shortlink = https://rvt.link/as
}}
}}


Latest revision as of 18:08, 25 January 2024


Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved: 2024-11-27
CLNP Page ID: 180
Page Categories: Tort Law
Citation: Intentional Interference with Economic Relations, CLNP 180, <https://rvt.link/as>, retrieved on 2024-11-27
Editor: MKent
Last Updated: 2024/01/25

Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076

Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today


Cable Assembly Systems Ltd. et al. v. Ben Barnes et al., 2019 ONSC 97 (CanLII)[1]

[55] Justice Nordheimer in Janssen-Ortho Inc. v. Amgen Canada Inc. (2003), 2003 CanLII 26024 (ON SC), 26 C.P.R. (4th) 93 (Ont. S.C.)[2] stated at para. 58:

In order to establish the tort of intentional interference with economic relations, Janssen must be able to establish three things:
(a) an intention to injure the plaintiff;
(b) interference with another’s method of gaining his or her living or business by illegal means; and
(c) economic loss caused thereby.

[1] [2]

Murphy v. Sutton Group, 2019 ONSC 2078 (CanLII)[3]

[94] There are three essential elements of the tort of intentional interference with economic relations:

i. the defendant must have intended to injure the plaintiff’s economic interest;
ii. the interference must have been by illegal or unlawful means; and
iii. the plaintiff must have suffered economic harm or loss as a result.

Grant Financial Management Inc. v. Solemio Transportation Inc., 2016 ONCA 175 (CanLII) at para. 62.[4] To successfully establish the tort, a plaintiff must prove a causal connection between the unlawful means and the loss suffered; Alleslev-Krofchak v. Valcom Limited, 2010 ONCA 557 (CanLII) at para. 50;[5] leave to appeal refused (2010) S.C.C.A. No. 403]. Intentionally interfering with another person’s economic interests is not actionable if the means used are lawful; Ontario Racing Commission v. O’Dwyer, 2008 ONCA 446 (CanLII) at para. 57.[6]

[3] [4] [5] [6]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Cable Assembly Systems Ltd. et al. v. Ben Barnes et al., 2019 ONSC 97 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/hx802>, retrieved on 2024-01-25
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Janssen-Ortho Inc. v. Amgen Canada Inc., 2003 CanLII 26024 (ON SC), <https://canlii.ca/t/6wmn>, retrieved on 2024-01-25
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Murphy v. Sutton Group, 2019 ONSC 2078 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/hzkgl>, retrieved on 2024-01-25
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Grand Financial Management Inc. v. Solemio Transportation Inc., 2016 ONCA 175 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/gnk6t>, retrieved on 2024-01-25
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Alleslev-Krofchak v. Valcom Limited, 2010 ONCA 557 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/2c4n5>, retrieved on 2024-01-25
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 Ontario Racing Commission v. O'Dwyer, 2008 ONCA 446 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/1x4rd>, retrieved on 2024-01-25
Retrieved from "https://riverview.legal/encyclopedia/index.php?title=Intentional_Interference_with_Economic_Relations&oldid=22624"