Redacted Documents in Evidence (LTB): Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Hearing Process (LTB) {{Citation: | categories = [Hearing Process (LTB)] | shortlink = }} ==TSL-95923-18-SA (Re), 2018 CanLII 141586 (ON LTB)<ref name="TSL-95...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Citation: | {{Citation: | ||
| categories = [Hearing Process (LTB)] | | categories = [Hearing Process (LTB)] | ||
| shortlink = | | shortlink = 4K | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 18:45, 19 October 2021
🥷 Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2025 © | |
---|---|
Date Retrieved: | 2025-04-04 |
CLNP Page ID: | 1782 |
Page Categories: | [Hearing Process (LTB)] |
Citation: | Redacted Documents in Evidence (LTB), CLNP 1782, <4K>, retrieved on 2025-04-04 |
Editor: | Sharvey |
Last Updated: | 2021/10/19 |
TSL-95923-18-SA (Re), 2018 CanLII 141586 (ON LTB)[1]
12. The Landlord did not summons the person who made the complaint to testify as a witness and did not submit a sworn statement, declaration, or affidavit from that person. The Landlord submitted the email and letter from the person who allegedly made the complaint. However, I note that these are heavily redacted to conceal the identity of the person and the signature on the letter is blacked out. As such, I can give little weight to these documents.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 TSL-95923-18-SA (Re), 2018 CanLII 141586 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/j0fjd>, retrieved on 2021-10-19