General Compensation (T5 Application): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "==<i>Kara-Bibar v Al-Dulaimi,</i> 2022 CanLII 86555 (ON LTB)<ref name="Kara-Bibar"/>== 37. The Tenant’s testimony on this point was detailed and consistent and we have no r...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Personal Use Application (LTB)]]
{{Citation:
| categories = Personal Use Application (LTB)
| shortlink =
}}
==<i>Kara-Bibar v Al-Dulaimi,</i> 2022 CanLII 86555 (ON LTB)<ref name="Kara-Bibar"/>==
==<i>Kara-Bibar v Al-Dulaimi,</i> 2022 CanLII 86555 (ON LTB)<ref name="Kara-Bibar"/>==



Revision as of 22:11, 25 October 2022


Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved: 2024-11-24
CLNP Page ID: 2019
Page Categories: Personal Use Application (LTB)
Citation: General Compensation (T5 Application), CLNP 2019, <>, retrieved on 2024-11-24
Editor: MKent
Last Updated: 2022/10/25

Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076

Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today


Kara-Bibar v Al-Dulaimi, 2022 CanLII 86555 (ON LTB)[1]

37. The Tenant’s testimony on this point was detailed and consistent and we have no reason to disbelieve him. We are persuaded by the Tenant’s testimony that he and his children experienced significant emotional distress as a result of the Landlord’s actions. Based on the evidence before us, and our knowledge of like similar cases, we find that an award of $2,000.00 is sufficient to recognize the emotional stress the Tenant and his family suffered as a result of the Landlord’s bad faith termination of tenancy. An order will issue accordingly.

References

[1]

  1. 1.0 1.1 Kara-Bibar v Al-Dulaimi, 2022 CanLII 86555 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/js1jj>, retrieved on 2022-10-25