By-Law (N13 Evictions): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Renovations, Demolition, and Conversions (RTA) {{Citation: | categories = | shortlink = }} ==<i>Morrish v Collins,</i> 2024 ONLTB 53690 (CanLII)<ref name="Morrish"/>== 23. <b><u>I note also that the City of Toronto has recently passed a “Renoviction Bylaw” that adds additional requirements on Landlords. There were no affidavits, or testimony that the renovations to add a staircase did not fall under the umbrella of this Bylaw.</b></u> I could not...")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


{{Citation:  
{{Citation:  
| categories =  
| categories = Renovations, Demolition, and Conversions (RTA)
| shortlink =  
| shortlink = https://rvt.link/cx
}}
}}



Revision as of 18:50, 26 August 2024


Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved: 2024-11-10
CLNP Page ID: 2402
Page Categories: Renovations, Demolition, and Conversions (RTA)
Citation: By-Law (N13 Evictions), CLNP 2402, <https://rvt.link/cx>, retrieved on 2024-11-10
Editor: MKent
Last Updated: 2024/08/26

Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076


Morrish v Collins, 2024 ONLTB 53690 (CanLII)[1]

23. I note also that the City of Toronto has recently passed a “Renoviction Bylaw” that adds additional requirements on Landlords. There were no affidavits, or testimony that the renovations to add a staircase did not fall under the umbrella of this Bylaw. I could not determine if the N12 notice was in fact being used as an attempt to circumvent the bylaw.

<ref name="Moorish">Morrish v Collins, 2024 ONLTB 53690 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/k60bf>, retrieved on 2024-08-26

References

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Morrish