By-Law (N13 Evictions): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category:Renovations, Demolition, and Conversions (RTA) {{Citation: | categories = | shortlink = }} ==<i>Morrish v Collins,</i> 2024 ONLTB 53690 (CanLII)<ref name="Morrish"/>== 23. <b><u>I note also that the City of Toronto has recently passed a “Renoviction Bylaw” that adds additional requirements on Landlords. There were no affidavits, or testimony that the renovations to add a staircase did not fall under the umbrella of this Bylaw.</b></u> I could not...")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


{{Citation:  
{{Citation:  
| categories =  
| categories = Renovations, Demolition, and Conversions (RTA)
| shortlink =  
| shortlink = https://rvt.link/cx
}}
}}



Revision as of 18:50, 26 August 2024


Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved: 2024-11-23
CLNP Page ID: 2402
Page Categories: Renovations, Demolition, and Conversions (RTA)
Citation: By-Law (N13 Evictions), CLNP 2402, <https://rvt.link/cx>, retrieved on 2024-11-23
Editor: MKent
Last Updated: 2024/08/26

Need Legal Help?
Call (888) 655-1076

Join our ranks and become a Ninja Initiate today


Morrish v Collins, 2024 ONLTB 53690 (CanLII)[1]

23. I note also that the City of Toronto has recently passed a “Renoviction Bylaw” that adds additional requirements on Landlords. There were no affidavits, or testimony that the renovations to add a staircase did not fall under the umbrella of this Bylaw. I could not determine if the N12 notice was in fact being used as an attempt to circumvent the bylaw.

<ref name="Moorish">Morrish v Collins, 2024 ONLTB 53690 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/k60bf>, retrieved on 2024-08-26

References

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Morrish