Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Category:Accident Benefits]] | | [[Category:Accident Benefits]] |
|
| |
| ==Canavan v. Unifund Assurance Company, 2021 CanLII 18912 (ON LAT)<ref name="Canavan"/>==
| |
|
| |
| 1. The applicant. was involved in motor vehicle accident on January 27, 2014. The applicant states that as a result of this accident he sustained serious physical and psychological injuries.
| |
|
| |
| 2. The applicant did not submit his application for accident benefits (OCF-1) to the respondent, Unifund, until more than 2 years had passed. The parties have differing views on the exact date of the submission of the OCF-1 however, both parties agree that it was more than 2 years following the accident.
| |
|
| |
| 3. There is no dispute between the parties that the applicant submitted his OCF-1 outside of the prescribed timelines in section 32 of the Schedule[1]. <b><u>Instead, the preliminary issue before the Tribunal is whether he has a reasonable explanation for that delay that would permit him to proceed with his application for accident benefits.</b></u>
| |
|
| |
| 8. The issues to be decided are:
| |
|
| |
| a) Is the applicant statue barred means of section 32(5) and 55(1) of the Schedule and if so has the applicant provided a reasonable explanation of delay pursuant to section 34 of the Schedule, such that he ought to be entitled to proceed with his claim for accident benefits?
| |
|
| |
| <ref name="Canavan">Canavan v. Unifund Assurance Company, 2021 CanLII 18912 (ON LAT), <https://canlii.ca/t/jdpxq>, retrieved on 2021-04-26</ref>
| |
Latest revision as of 00:59, 7 July 2022
Pages in category "OCF-1"
This category contains only the following page.
