Duty to Accommodate (LTB): Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "==TSL-74673-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 71617 (ON LTB)<ref name="TSL-74673"/>== 16. In <i>Walmer Developments v. Ava Wolch,</i> (2003) 2003 CanLII 42163 (ON SCDC), 67 O.R. (3d) 24...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Human Rights (LTB)]]
[[Category:Human Rights]]
{{Citation:
| categories = Human Rights (LTB), Human Rights
| shortlink = 76
}}
==TSL-74673-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 71617 (ON LTB)<ref name="TSL-74673"/>==
==TSL-74673-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 71617 (ON LTB)<ref name="TSL-74673"/>==


Line 10: Line 18:
TSL-74673-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 71617 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/gv8dx>, retrieved on 2022-05-05</ref>
TSL-74673-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 71617 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/gv8dx>, retrieved on 2022-05-05</ref>
<ref name="Walmer"><i>
<ref name="Walmer"><i>
Walmer Developments v. Wolch,</i> 2003 CanLII 42163 (ON SCDC), <https://canlii.ca/t/5z8k>, retrieved on 2022-05-05
Walmer Developments v. Wolch,</i> 2003 CanLII 42163 (ON SCDC), <https://canlii.ca/t/5z8k>, retrieved on 2022-05-05</ref>

Latest revision as of 17:30, 5 May 2022


Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved: 2024-05-10
CLNP Page ID: 1914
Page Categories: Human Rights (LTB), Human Rights
Citation: Duty to Accommodate (LTB), CLNP 1914, <76>, retrieved on 2024-05-10
Editor: MKent
Last Updated: 2022/05/05


TSL-74673-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 71617 (ON LTB)[1]

16. In Walmer Developments v. Ava Wolch, (2003) 2003 CanLII 42163 (ON SCDC), 67 O.R. (3d) 246, a case involving schizophrenia, the Divisional Court concluded that landlords are required to accommodate the needs of disabled tenants to the point of undue hardship.[2] Accordingly, the Board, when exercising discretion under section 83 of the Act, must have regard to a landlord’s obligations under section 17 of the Ontario Human Rights Code.

17. In Walmer v. Wolch the tenant’s behaviour was acceptable so long as she was on her medication. In addition, the tenant requested reasonable accommodation from the Landlord, specifically, that the Landlord immediately inform the tenant’s relatives if the tenant’s conduct became disturbing. The court also stated that if the tenant’s behaviour did not improve promptly, the Landlord could proceed under what was then the Tenant Protection Act.

References

[1] [2]

  1. 1.0 1.1 TSL-74673-16 (Re), 2016 CanLII 71617 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/gv8dx>, retrieved on 2022-05-05
  2. 2.0 2.1 Walmer Developments v. Wolch, 2003 CanLII 42163 (ON SCDC), <https://canlii.ca/t/5z8k>, retrieved on 2022-05-05