General Compensation (T5 Application): Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Citation: | {{Citation: | ||
| categories = Personal Use Application (LTB) | | categories = Personal Use Application (LTB) | ||
| shortlink = | | shortlink = https://rvt.link/1f | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:12, 25 October 2022
| Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2024-05-21 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 2019 |
| Page Categories: | Personal Use Application (LTB) |
| Citation: | General Compensation (T5 Application), CLNP 2019, <https://rvt.link/1f>, retrieved on 2024-05-21 |
| Editor: | MKent |
| Last Updated: | 2022/10/25 |
Kara-Bibar v Al-Dulaimi, 2022 CanLII 86555 (ON LTB)[1]
37. The Tenant’s testimony on this point was detailed and consistent and we have no reason to disbelieve him. We are persuaded by the Tenant’s testimony that he and his children experienced significant emotional distress as a result of the Landlord’s actions. Based on the evidence before us, and our knowledge of like similar cases, we find that an award of $2,000.00 is sufficient to recognize the emotional stress the Tenant and his family suffered as a result of the Landlord’s bad faith termination of tenancy. An order will issue accordingly.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Kara-Bibar v Al-Dulaimi, 2022 CanLII 86555 (ON LTB), <https://canlii.ca/t/js1jj>, retrieved on 2022-10-25
