Legal Costs (Construction)

From Riverview Legal Group
Revision as of 19:59, 22 January 2023 by MKent (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Construction & Renovation {{Citation: | categories = Construction & Renovation | shortlink = }} ==<i>Construction Act</i>, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30<ref name="Con...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved: 2024-05-10
CLNP Page ID: 2059
Page Categories: Construction & Renovation
Citation: Legal Costs (Construction), CLNP 2059, <>, retrieved on 2024-05-10
Editor: MKent
Last Updated: 2023/01/22


Construction Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30[1]

Costs

86 (1) Subject to subsection (2), any order as to the costs in an action, application, motion or any other step in a proceeding under this Act is in the discretion of the court, and an order as to costs may be made against,

(a) a party to the action or motion; or
(b) a person who represented a party to the action, application or motion, where the person,
(i) knowingly participated in the preservation or perfection of a lien, or represented a party at the trial of an action, where it is clear that the claim for a lien is without foundation, is frivolous, vexatious or an abuse of process, or is for a wilfully exaggerated amount, or that the lien has expired, or
(ii) prejudiced or delayed the conduct of the action,

and the order may be made on a substantial indemnity basis, including where the motion is heard by a person other than a judge or the action has been referred under section 58.

Where least expensive course not taken

(2) Where the least expensive course is not taken by a party, the costs allowed to the party shall not exceed what would have been incurred had the least expensive course been taken.

Reid v. Xiao, 2022 ONSC 4524 (CanLII)[2]

[64] For the reasons above, I find that Mr. Reid is entitled to recover his legal fees paid for preserving and perfecting his lien, closing pleadings, and obtaining the judgment of reference, on a partial indemnity basis, plus his disbursements in the action. I am otherwise persuaded that Mr. Reid’s failure to engage in reasonable settlement negotiations (based on the submissions before me), particularly following the Owners’ offer to settle, and his seeming unwillingness to appreciate the evidentiary shortcomings in his case and offer to compromise his claim, support that Mr. Reid should ultimately be awarded no costs for his own time.

[65] I thereby fix Mr. Reid’s costs of the action on a partial indemnity basis in the amount of $9,000, including HST and disbursements. That figure is comprised of $4,700, including HST, for his legal fees incurred at the beginning of litigation, plus $4,300 in disbursements.

References

[1] [2]Reid v. Xiao, 2022 ONSC 4524 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jr6qw>, retrieved on 2023-01-22</ref>

  1. 1.0 1.1 Construction Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30, <https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90c30#BK130>, retrieved on 2023-01-22
  2. 2.0 2.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Reid