Obligation to Provide a Copy of the Signed Lease: Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
(Created page with "Category: Landlord Tenant ===[http://canlii.ca/t/gs65x Arora v Wieleba, 2016 CanLII 37551 (ON SCSM)]=== 15. This is not a case where a copy of the lease sig...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Contract Law, Leases, & Sub-Letting (LTB)]] | ||
== | {{Citation: | ||
| categories = Contract Law, Leases, & Sub-Letting (LTB) | |||
| shortlink = https://rvt.link/63 | |||
}} | |||
===<i>Arora v Wieleba,</i> 2016 CanLII 37551 (ON SCSM)<ref name="Arora"/>=== | |||
16. | 15. This is not a case where a copy of the lease signed by the landlord was delivered later than the 21-day period contemplated by the section. It appears and I find that even during the litigation, assuming for the sake of argument that providing a copy after litigation commenced would revive the tenant’s obligation to pay rent, no copy of the lease signed by the landlord was provided to Ms. Wieleba. | ||
16. Section 12(4) suspends the obligation to pay rent and prohibits the landlord from requiring the tenant to pay rent. On these facts I find those provisions remain operative today. Therefore the plaintiff’s claim must be dismissed. | |||
==References== | |||
<ref name="Arora"><i>Arora v Wieleba,</i> 2016 CanLII 37551 (ON SCSM), <https://canlii.ca/t/gs65x>, retrieved on 2023-05-25</ref> | |||
Latest revision as of 05:53, 25 May 2023
| Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2024-05-18 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 64 |
| Page Categories: | Contract Law, Leases, & Sub-Letting (LTB) |
| Citation: | Obligation to Provide a Copy of the Signed Lease, CLNP 64, <https://rvt.link/63>, retrieved on 2024-05-18 |
| Editor: | MKent |
| Last Updated: | 2023/05/25 |
Arora v Wieleba, 2016 CanLII 37551 (ON SCSM)[1]
15. This is not a case where a copy of the lease signed by the landlord was delivered later than the 21-day period contemplated by the section. It appears and I find that even during the litigation, assuming for the sake of argument that providing a copy after litigation commenced would revive the tenant’s obligation to pay rent, no copy of the lease signed by the landlord was provided to Ms. Wieleba.
16. Section 12(4) suspends the obligation to pay rent and prohibits the landlord from requiring the tenant to pay rent. On these facts I find those provisions remain operative today. Therefore the plaintiff’s claim must be dismissed.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Arora v Wieleba, 2016 CanLII 37551 (ON SCSM), <https://canlii.ca/t/gs65x>, retrieved on 2023-05-25
