Contract Interpretation: Difference between revisions

From Riverview Legal Group
(Created page with "Category:Contract Law {{Citation: | categories = Contract Law | shortlink = }} ==<i>2629812 Ontario Ltd. v. Cameron,</i> 2023 ONSC 4468 (CanLII)<ref name="2629812"/>== [57] The goal of contract interpretation is to determine the intent of the parties and the scope of their understanding at the time the contract was made. To do so, the contract must be read as a whole. Words are to be given their ordinary and grammatical meaning. The contract and the wo...")
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Citation:  
{{Citation:  
| categories = Contract Law
| categories = Contract Law
| shortlink =  
| shortlink = https://rvt.link/bz
}}
}}


==<i>2629812 Ontario Ltd. v. Cameron,</i> 2023 ONSC 4468 (CanLII)<ref name="2629812"/>==
==<i>2629812 Ontario Ltd. v. Cameron,</i> 2023 ONSC 4468 (CanLII)<ref name="2629812Ont"/>==


[57]          The goal of contract interpretation is to determine the intent of the parties and the scope of their understanding at the time the contract was made. To do so, the contract must be read as a whole. Words are to be given their ordinary and grammatical meaning. The contract and the words are to be read in a manner consistent with the surrounding circumstances known to the parties at the time of formation of the contract.  <i>Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp.</i> 2014 SCC 53 at para. 47.<ref name="Sattva"/>
[57]          The goal of contract interpretation is to determine the intent of the parties and the scope of their understanding at the time the contract was made. To do so, the contract must be read as a whole. Words are to be given their ordinary and grammatical meaning. The contract and the words are to be read in a manner consistent with the surrounding circumstances known to the parties at the time of formation of the contract.  <i>Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp.</i> 2014 SCC 53 at para. 47.<ref name="Sattva"/>


<ref name="2629812"><i>2629812 Ontario Ltd. v. Cameron,</i> 2023 ONSC 4468 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jzgq7>, retrieved on 2024-05-30</ref>
<ref name="2629812Ont"><i>2629812 Ontario Ltd. v. Cameron,</i> 2023 ONSC 4468 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jzgq7>, retrieved on 2024-05-30</ref>
<ref name="Sattva"><i>Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp.,</i> 2014 SCC 53 (CanLII), [2014] 2 SCR 633, <https://canlii.ca/t/g88q1>, retrieved on 2024-05-30</ref>
<ref name="Sattva"><i>Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp.,</i> 2014 SCC 53 (CanLII), [2014] 2 SCR 633, <https://canlii.ca/t/g88q1>, retrieved on 2024-05-30</ref>


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 02:15, 31 May 2024


Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 ©
Date Retrieved: 2024-06-29
CLNP Page ID: 2381
Page Categories: Contract Law
Citation: Contract Interpretation, CLNP 2381, <https://rvt.link/bz>, retrieved on 2024-06-29
Editor: MKent
Last Updated: 2024/05/31


2629812 Ontario Ltd. v. Cameron, 2023 ONSC 4468 (CanLII)[1]

[57] The goal of contract interpretation is to determine the intent of the parties and the scope of their understanding at the time the contract was made. To do so, the contract must be read as a whole. Words are to be given their ordinary and grammatical meaning. The contract and the words are to be read in a manner consistent with the surrounding circumstances known to the parties at the time of formation of the contract. Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp. 2014 SCC 53 at para. 47.[2]

[1] [2]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 2629812 Ontario Ltd. v. Cameron, 2023 ONSC 4468 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jzgq7>, retrieved on 2024-05-30
  2. 2.0 2.1 Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53 (CanLII), [2014] 2 SCR 633, <https://canlii.ca/t/g88q1>, retrieved on 2024-05-30