Contract Interpretation: Difference between revisions
From Riverview Legal Group
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Citation: | {{Citation: | ||
| categories = Contract Law | | categories = Contract Law | ||
| shortlink = | | shortlink = https://rvt.link/bz | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:15, 31 May 2024
| Caselaw.Ninja, Riverview Group Publishing 2021 © | |
|---|---|
| Date Retrieved: | 2024-06-29 |
| CLNP Page ID: | 2381 |
| Page Categories: | Contract Law |
| Citation: | Contract Interpretation, CLNP 2381, <https://rvt.link/bz>, retrieved on 2024-06-29 |
| Editor: | MKent |
| Last Updated: | 2024/05/31 |
2629812 Ontario Ltd. v. Cameron, 2023 ONSC 4468 (CanLII)[1]
[57] The goal of contract interpretation is to determine the intent of the parties and the scope of their understanding at the time the contract was made. To do so, the contract must be read as a whole. Words are to be given their ordinary and grammatical meaning. The contract and the words are to be read in a manner consistent with the surrounding circumstances known to the parties at the time of formation of the contract. Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp. 2014 SCC 53 at para. 47.[2]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 2629812 Ontario Ltd. v. Cameron, 2023 ONSC 4468 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/jzgq7>, retrieved on 2024-05-30
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53 (CanLII), [2014] 2 SCR 633, <https://canlii.ca/t/g88q1>, retrieved on 2024-05-30
