Riverview Logo

Edit: This article was originally published on June 26, 2021  however some changes were made and was republished on May 17, 2022.

How We Got To TARA

History is full of unintended consequences.  In 2014, the Toronto Star was working on an investigative report and required documents from the Ontario Labour Relations Board. The Labour Relations Board agreed and provided the requested documents. Sometime later, the Labour Relations Board changed their minds and wanted the documents back. The Toronto Star said no, these documents are part of the public record. This incident inspired the Toronto Star to later file an action against the Ministry of the Attorney General over the issue of having access to tribunal records, tribunals such as the Landlord and Tenant Board.1Secrecy often chokes off public information from tribunal hearings, The Toronto Star, https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2017/02/17/secrecy-often-chokes-off-public-information-from-tribunal-hearings.html, retrieved June 25, 2020

On April 27, 2018, the Court released their decision, confirming that the public has a right to access tribunal records and that the Freedom of Information Act does not apply to tribunal records.2Toronto Star v. AG Ontario, 2018 ONSC 2586 (CanLII), <https://canlii.ca/t/hrq6s>, retrieved on 2021-06-24

The Legal Principal At Issue

There is a legal principal called the open court principal. This means anything that happens during a court matter is 100% accessible to the public, subject to either a publication ban or confidentiality order. This follows the mantra that justice must be seen and allows the courts to operate transparently. Sometimes when the Court makes a ruling that is as extreme as striking down a law. The Court will stay (suspend) their decision for a period of time. As part of this decision, the Court stayed their decision. This was done to allow the Ontario Legislature time to draft a proper law. That law would become TARA.

Before this decision, if someone wanted to access tribunal matter records, they would have to file a freedom of information request. Unfortunately, a freedom of information request can be denied for very specific reasons. This ultimately became a barrier to the open court principle.

Open Tribunal Principal

On June 30, 2019, TARA came into force with the purpose of codifying the open court principle for tribunals.3Tribunal Adjudicative Records Act, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/19t07, retrieved June 24, 2021 As of June 24, 2021, TARA covers 23 different tribunals in Ontario.4O. Reg. 211/19: GENERAL, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/190211, retrieved June 24, 2021

TARA does not just give access to decisions, it gives access to everything. This includes the initial application, evidence, transcripts, and more. With a greater push to have anything digital, it becomes extremely easy to get entire tribunal files.

How It Works

In order to do a TARA request, you send in a request to Access.TO-TDO@ontario.ca with the required information. Caselaw.Ninja has a wonderful guide on how to put together a TARA request for yourself.

Why This Matters for the Landlord and Tenant Board

Unlike some tribunals such as the Human Rights Tribunal, which publishes every decision or the Licence Appeal Tribunal, which publishes every reconsideration (appeal) decision. The Landlord and Tenant Board has trouble publishing all of their decisions.

Why does this matter? It matters because with access to more information, we at Riverview Legal can be even more effective advocates. We can see if a Landlord has done previous evictions using the N12. If a Landlord has been using the N12 for illegal evictions. We can hold that Landlord to account. Does the Landlord have a track record of failing to do maintenance? With that kind of information, we can establish a pattern of failing to meet maintenance obligati0ns. We can see if a Landlord has a history of illegally locking out tenants. The Landlord and Tenant Board isn’t going to look favourably on a Landlord with a history of illegal lockouts.

With this information, we can continue to push the limits of the law to protect our clients’ rights.

Post Author: Mitchell Kent